Why is Error Management So Important
Most people confuse error management with just being able to catch bugs, but that is not true. Bugs will arise, and error management means being able to mitigate the worst-case occurrences when things go south. Imagine a programming malfunction, the application’s functionality will be impacted and it can show an incorrect output, which can not only result in data loss, but can also crash the system and in the worst case make the entire system vulnerable. What’s more, error management means devising a method for the program to resolve and rectify the unexpected situations during the execution, or in situations where it can not rectify it, then alert the user.When you write some code to rectify those errors, you already expect the program to malfunction, and this can drastically improve the user experience by making the application much stronger and more efficient.
Types of Errors in C++
Errors in C++ can largely be classified into two groups, namely, compile-time errors and runtime errors.1. Compile-time Errors
Compile-time errors happen when a source code is being compiled. These errors can only occur before the program has ever been executed, and they are discovered by the compiler. Missing files, bad calls to a function or simply a syntactical error cause these. These errors are simple to correct because they can be discovered quickly. Nonetheless, since these errors exist, the program is unable to run.As an example, a missed semicolon or an improperly named variable will cause a compile-time issue. All of these issues should be fixed first before the code can be compiled.
2. Runtime Errors
A program that has been completed may generate errors on execution. Unlike compile time issues, runtime errors are way harder since they are program dependent as well as input dependent. Zero division, invalid memory access, and insufficient memory needed for performing certain operations are a few predictors of runtime errors. Program crash, abnormal termination and wrong output are some of the side effects of runtime errors.Certain run-time errors can be expected – for example, users failing to provide any input – and such errors can be accounted for. However, some errors, such as hardware malfunctions or lack of available resources, are difficult to predict. However, proper practices of handling errors can help relieve the effects of the run-time errors.
C++ Error Handling Functions
C++ contains a number of error handling functions, and the most common one is concerned with throwing exceptions. As well as that, error handling can also be achieved by using error codes, return values, and assertions. In the paragraphs below, the function of exceptions in error handling is analyzed.1. Exceptions
One of the best features added in C++ is exception handling which is used for handling run time errors. It enables a program to catch exceptional situations in a reasonable manner. Whenever an error occurs, the program throws an exception and interrupts this normal sequence of execution. The program then looks for a particular section of code known as the exception handler to handle the raised exception.In C++, exceptions are handled by throwing an object that is usually derived from the std::exception class. If this exception is caught during the code execution, it’s handled in a specific block. This approach makes it possible to split the business logic of the program from the error management code, which renders it clear and more maintainable.
The use of throw and catch of exceptions is useful because it gives stronger cover on the errors. The way throwing an error works is that the program is able to resolve the error and continue its run, or the program is terminated if the error is serious. However, this is not the only method as exceptions can also be used to further coordinate the handling of errors blocking similar errors in the same entire block.
2. Return Values and Error Codes
Exception handling was not always used, and one common way of handling errors was through the use of error codes or error return values. This practice involves a function that on failure will return special values such as -1 or 0 for instance while the function prototype would have been in the form of int foo(). Thus the calling code would check and act based on the value returned.Although straightforward, this approach does have multiple issues. For instance, it does not distinguish between standard return values and values signifying an error, thus making it all too easy to overlook her structural flaws. Consequently, error codes tend to become rather cumbersome, leading the design to become less readable.
3. Assertions
Similar to error codes, C++ also introduces the use of assertion errors. An assertion can be termed as a statement that will check for certain conditions at specific points within the program, if the condition is not met, the program will stop, providing the user with an error message. Assertions are mostly helpful in the stage of coding and debugging as they ensure that the program works as desired.Assertions do not substitute the required error management processes but serve as a means of picking up coding blunders in the early phases of development. They are helpful in checking assumptions and logical mistakes that are otherwise rather hard to identify.
Effective Error Handling Strategies in C++
Developers should respect themselves and read from their caps at the mechanics, but error-handling code in C++ is never important to program implementers for their appropriate position which catches wherein the level the program. It is best.Secondly, for both the user and the developer, the core problem annexed is stated and how to fix it. Phrases like "An error occurred" are best avoided with details about the type of error and its location preferred.
In most cases however such codes ARE poorly documented and no comments exist to explain their purpose. Local error holding mechanisms SHOULD BE preferred since they are easier to manage and trace, these serve to SCOR universal kinetic error codes.
To wrap things up, it is worth reiterating that writing tests for error-handling code is equally important. The program should be able to handle a variety of situations without failing or acting strangely if it is designed with good error-handling in mind. Testing ensures that any bugs that have been handled are done so properly and that the program performs as intended in a variety of conditions.
